Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer

Analysis of genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of oral mucosa in smokers and non-smokers after exposed to digital intraoral radiography

Abstract

Objectives : To analyze genotoxic and sitotoxic indicators of buccal epithelial cells by measuring the number of cells contain micronucleus, pycnosis, karyorrhexis, karyolysis and to determine the change in oxidative stress of  oral mucosa cells using salivary MDA levels between smokers and nonsmokers before and after exposure to intraoral radiographs during endodontic treatment.Material and Methods : This research was an analytic observation research with cross-sectional design. The sample was divided into smokers (n = 5) and non-smokers group (n = 5). The buccal epithelial cells was taken with cytobrush and unstimulated saliva in each group were taken by the draining method shortly before intraoral radiography, 10±2 days after first  day exposure, 10±2 days after second day exposure. The cells were stained using Papanicolau (PAP) kit and observed by pathologist. Genotoxic and cytotoxic indicator measured by counted the number of cells contain mironucleus, pyknosis, karyorrhexis and karyolysis under light microscope with 400X magnification according to the Tolbert criteria in 1000 cells. While oxidative stress of cell measured by salivary MDA with Thiobarbitoric Acid (TBA) assay.Result : The number of micronucleus, pyknosis, karyorrhexis, karyolysis in buccal epithelial cells and salivary MDA levels in smokers was higher than non-smokers (p<0,05). There were no significant differences in genotoxic and cytotoxic indicators and salivary MDA levels before and after the last exposure in smokers and non-smokers (p>0,05).Conclusion : The results of this study indicate that the use of intraoral radiographs is within safe limits despite repeated exposure after several days.
Section

References

  1. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles
  2. and interpretation. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
  3. Abbas AW, Zaidan TF, Al-barrak AYA. Assessment of
  4. serum and salivary malondialdehyde in patients with oral
  5. lichen planus. J Bagh Coll Dent 2014;26: 99-102.
  6. Amtha R, Kurniadi A. An overview of oral mucosa
  7. condition of shisha smoker. J Dentomaxillofacial Sci
  8. ;1: 67-70.
  9. Gowhar O. Comparison of exfoliative cytology of tongue
  10. and buccal mucosa among smokers and non-smokers
  11. using PAP stain and AgNOR counts. Int J Contemp Med
  12. Res 2017;4: 1587-1590.
  13. Kusuma A. alveolar bone loss, tooth loss. J UNISSULA
  14. ;1: 1-8.
  15. Khoubnasabjafari M, Ansarin K, Jouyban A. Salivary
  16. malondialdehyde as an oxidative stress biomarker in
  17. oral and systemic diseases. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent
  18. Prospects 2016;10: 71-75.
  19. Cerqueira EMM, Gomes-filho IS, Trindade S, et al.
  20. Genetic damage in exfoliated cells from oral mucosa of
  21. individuals exposed to x-rays during panoramic dental
  22. radiographies. Mutat Res 2004;562: 111-117.
  23. Angelieri F, Yujra VQ, Tizuko C, et al. Do Dental x-rays
  24. induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in oral mucosa cells?
  25. a critical review. Anticancer Res 2017; 37: 5383-5388.
  26. Kesidi S, Maloth KN, Vinay K, et al. Genotoxic and
  27. cytotoxic biomonitoring in patients exposed to full
  28. mouth radiographs – a radiological and cytological study.
  29. J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2017;5: 1-6.
  30. Smriti K, Muralidhar K, Ravindranath V. Science direct
  31. role of salivary malondialdehyde in assessment of oxidative stress among diabetics. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res
  32. ;6: 41-44.
  33. Panganiban RM, Snow AL, Day RM. Mechanisms of
  34. radiation toxicity in transformed and. Int J Mol Sci
  35. ;14: 15931-15958.
  36. Rahmah N. Analisis Sitogenik Mukronukleus Mukosa
  37. Bukal pada Perokok Aktif dan Pasif. Dentino
  38. ;1: 15-20.
  39. Holland N, Bolognesi C, Kirsch-volders M, et al.
  40. Mutation research/reviews in mutation research the
  41. micronucleus assay in human buccal cells as a tool for
  42. biomonitoring DNA damage : The HUMN project
  43. perspective on current status and knowledge gaps. Mutat
  44. Res 2008;659: 93-108.
  45. Ozturk O, Meydan A, Healthcare F. Effects of
  46. smoking on oral cavity. J Exp Clin Med 2017;34: 3-7.
  47. Fenech M, Natarajan AT. Molecular mechanisms of
  48. micronucleus, nucleoplasmic bridge and nuclear bud
  49. formation in mammalian and human cells. Mutagenesis
  50. ;26: 125-132.
  51. Demİrtaş M, Şenel Ü, Yüksel S, et al. A comparison of the
  52. generation of free radicals in saliva of active and passive
  53. smokers. Turkish J Med Sci 2014;44: 208-211.
  54. Menicagli R, Duca MRP. Development research
  55. monitoring of oxidative stress induced by cigarette
  56. smoke by analysis salivary malondialdehide with the use
  57. of dipsticks. Int J Dev Res 2016;6: 7546-7551.
  58. Kurku H, Kacmaz M, Kisa U, et al. Acute and chronic
  59. impact of smoking on salivary and serum total
  60. antioxidant. J Pak Med Assoc 2015;65: 164-169.
  61. Li G, Yang P, Hao S, et al. Buccal mucosa cell damage in
  62. individuals following dental x-ray examinations. Sci Rep.
  63. ;1: 1-7.

How to Cite

Wulansari, D. P., Arsyad, A., Rieuwpassa, I. E., Hamrun, N., & Hasyim, R. (2019). Analysis of genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of oral mucosa in smokers and non-smokers after exposed to digital intraoral radiography. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science, 4(3), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v4i3.961

HTML
306

Total
321

Share

Search Panel

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>